Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S314709AbSDVT42>; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:56:28 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S314715AbSDVTyY>; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:54:24 -0400
Received: from panic.tn.gatech.edu ([130.207.137.62]:63949 "HELO gtf.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S314714AbSDVTyT>;
	Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:54:19 -0400
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:54:13 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>
Cc: "Jonathan A. George" <JGeorge@greshamstorage.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Message-ID: <20020422155413.D20999@havoc.gtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <3CC4585F.4060005@greshamstorage.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020422204204.00ad1e60@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:47:39PM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Taking out the document only because it describes a non-free tool is 
> ridiculous. I don't object to the removal per se. I could live with that. I 
> object to the REASONS for removal.

Likewise.  This is perhaps saying it better than I have been...

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/