Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S314723AbSDVUNn>; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:13:43 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S314724AbSDVUNm>; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:13:42 -0400
Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:39394 "EHLO math.psu.edu")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S314723AbSDVUNm>;
	Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:13:42 -0400
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:13:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
To: "Jonathan A. George" <JGeorge@greshamstorage.com>
cc: Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
In-Reply-To: <3CC46B07.8020604@greshamstorage.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0204221603070.5686-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jonathan A. George wrote:

> Alexander Viro wrote:

> >On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jonathan A. George wrote:

> >>No need.  His tools are his choice.  The kernel itself is ours not his; 
                                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> thus the distinction.
> >
> >Bullshit.  His copy is his.  Mine is mine.  Yours is yours.  Each of
> >us is perfectly within his rights when he adds whatever patches he
> >likes.
> >
> Both statements are true.  Imagine that.

So where the hell do you or anybody else get the right to prohibit him adding
GPLed file to his copy?

RTFGPL.  Again, if you don't like said additions - fucking tough,
they are explicitly allowed by the license.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/