Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S314726AbSDVUSY>; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:18:24 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S314727AbSDVUSX>; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:18:23 -0400
Received: from panic.tn.gatech.edu ([130.207.137.62]:28623 "HELO gtf.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S314726AbSDVUSW>;
	Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:18:22 -0400
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:18:19 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
Message-ID: <20020422161819.F20999@havoc.gtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204202108410.10137-100000@home.transmeta.com> <E16zLOF-0001II-00@starship> <20020422135221.D11216@havoc.gtf.org> <E16zLiI-0001Ii-00@starship>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 08:05:25PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Monday 22 April 2002 19:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Should we remove all advertisements from the kernel?  A Big Penguin
> > would probably object to the removal of this printk advertisement
> > for Swansea:
> > 
> > 	Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4
> > 	Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
> > 
> > If the answer is no, then you are targetting BitKeeper specifically...
> 
> Excellent point.  If the BitKeeper advertising in the kernel source were
> held to that level, I would be satisfied.

<chuckle> -- and if that occurred, _I_ would fight to remove it as a
pointless advertisement.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/