Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:42:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:42:17 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-131.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.131]:43679 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:42:16 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:42:46 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To:

<20020422161819.F20999@havoc.gtf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 22 April 2002 22:18, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 08:05:25PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On Monday 22 April 2002 19:52, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Should we remove all advertisements from the kernel? A Big Penguin > > > would probably object to the removal of this printk advertisement > > > for Swansea: > > > > > > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 > > > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 > > > > > > If the answer is no, then you are targetting BitKeeper specifically... > > > > Excellent point. If the BitKeeper advertising in the kernel source were > > held to that level, I would be satisfied. > > -- and if that occurred, _I_ would fight to remove it as a > pointless advertisement. You'd want to get rid of the url that points at your docs? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/