Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:48:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:48:47 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-131.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.131]:48031 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:48:42 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Daniel Phillips To: dean gaudet Subject: Re: double-standard? (Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:49:10 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Larry McVoy , Jeff Garzik , In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 22 April 2002 22:37, dean gaudet wrote: > i happen to put food on my table working at a hardware company; larry puts > food on his working at a software company. ?i happen to work at the same > hardware company as linus does: ?transmeta. ?every kernel for the past, > uh, 6 or 7 years, has included an advertisement for transmeta. ?could we > possibly conceive of removing all references to transmeta from the kernel, > mailing lists and archives? How big is the Transmeta ad? Does it have its own file? Would you be satisfied if Bitkeeper had the same size advertisement as Transmeta? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/