Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:54:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:54:30 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-131.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.131]:52127 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:54:28 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:54:58 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: dean gaudet , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020422164728.H20999@havoc.gtf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 22 April 2002 22:47, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:57:55PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > I do. I don't agree with you that any of this has something to do with free > > speech, but I'm willing to accept that you view the kernel source as a kind of > > podium. > > I conjecture, then, that moving the BK doc to satisfy sensitivies is > also acknowledge of the kernel sources as a podium :) More like a monument. Currently, with a billboard on it. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/