Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:31:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:31:04 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:57116 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:31:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:30:59 -0400 From: Doug Ledford To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Daniel Phillips , Larry McVoy , Ian Molton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... Message-ID: <20020422173059.D914@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Jeff Garzik , Daniel Phillips , Larry McVoy , Ian Molton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To:

<20020422165327.A914@redhat.com> <20020422172537.A13585@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:25:37PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > To imply that the BK doc is an intentioned advertisement is silly. > It's in the kernel source tree to help people with, like it or not, what > is a part of kernel development. An _optional_ part. Which is *exactly* why it belongs with the kernel docs, and not on bitkeeper's web site. It's an optional part of the kernel process, and just because BK has a license some people don't like is no reason to *not* document how that optional process works. -- Doug Ledford 919-754-3700 x44233 Red Hat, Inc. 1801 Varsity Dr. Raleigh, NC 27606 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/