Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:14:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:14:12 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-131.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.131]:34976 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:14:11 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] BK license change Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 00:14:44 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] In-Reply-To: <20020421095715.A10525@work.bitmover.com> <20020422143527.K18800@work.bitmover.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 22 April 2002 23:35, Larry McVoy wrote: > So that leaves a more selective approach. We can add a clause that says > we reserve the right to insist you either > > a) maintain your changes in public within 90 days of making them, or That's going beyond what the gpl requires. Nobody needs to share their changes unless they distribute the binaries. > b) buy closed use seats, or > c) cease to use the product. > > and then apply it to the abusers of the system. I understand this is > still a scary thing in that there is no guarentee that we won't knock > on your door, but the reality is that people always find ways to > avoid the intent of licenses and we need some recourse. At least this > way doesn't force this upon everyone, you have to exhibit some bad > behaviour in order for us to notice. > > If you have a better idea on how to shut down the abusers without scaring > the legit users, I'm all ears. No need to play mall cop. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/