Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:22:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:22:17 -0400 Received: from panic.tn.gatech.edu ([130.207.137.62]:44756 "HELO gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:22:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:22:14 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik To: Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OFF TOPIC] BK license change Message-ID: <20020422182214.A18907@havoc.gtf.org> In-Reply-To: <20020421095715.A10525@work.bitmover.com> <20020422143527.K18800@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 02:35:27PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: > So that leaves a more selective approach. We can add a clause that says > we reserve the right to insist you either > > a) maintain your changes in public within 90 days of making them, or > b) buy closed use seats, or > c) cease to use the product. A (IMO -- feel free to debunk me :)) troublesome point is dead software. What do I do if I start a project under BK, code on it for three months, and abandon the project / slack off / have the manager kill it. Are they still obligated to make the software public? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/