Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:49:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:49:33 -0400 Received: from 216-42-72-164.ppp.netsville.net ([216.42.72.164]:1441 "EHLO roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:49:32 -0400 Subject: Re: XFS in the main kernel From: Chris Mason To: Matthias Andree Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020422221952.GB10813@merlin.emma.line.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 Date: 22 Apr 2002 18:47:59 -0400 Message-Id: <1019515679.16727.13.camel@tiny> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 18:19, Matthias Andree wrote: > Is there a test suite that checks POSIX (or better yet, SUS v3) > compliance of a file system? That might prove useful, although I'm well > aware it'd probably require some brains (and kernel modules) to check > consistency guarantees. But apart from that, things like "truncate to > zero length does not change the mtime of a file" (fixed in ReiserFS only > some weeks ago) might get caught that way. ftp://ftp.freestandards.org/pub/lsb/test_suites/ -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/