Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:29:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:29:38 -0400 Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:16402 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:29:35 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: wichert@cistron.nl (Wichert Akkerman) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: XFS in the main kernel In-Reply-To: Your message of "22 Apr 2002 18:55:20 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:29:22 +1000 Message-ID: <6047.1019518162@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22 Apr 2002 18:55:20 +0200, wichert@cistron.nl (Wichert Akkerman) wrote: >In article <3CC427F4.12C40426@fnal.gov>, >Dan Yocum wrote: >>I know it's been discussed to death, but I am making a formal request to you >>to include XFS in the main kernel. We (The Sloan Digital Sky Survey) and >>many, many other groups here at Fermilab would be very happy to have this in >>the main tree. > >Has XFS been proven to be completely stable As much as any other filesystem. "There are no bugs in filesystem XYZ. That just means that you have not looked hard enough." :) There is a daily QA suite that XFS is run through. >The reason I am asking is that XFS seems to be a fairly common >factor for segfault bugreports in dpkg. dpkg uses mmap? There was a bug in XFS and mmapped files where incorrect blocks were flushed to disk under high load, but that was fixed around January 30. -- Not speaking for sgi. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/