Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:41:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:41:39 -0400 Received: from [203.200.51.170] ([203.200.51.170]:19446 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:41:38 -0400 Message-Id: <200204231054.g3NArPI18473@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: rpm Reply-To: rajendra.mishra@timesys.com Organization: Timesys To: Frank Louwers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BUG: 2 NICs on same network Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:23:25 +0530 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] In-Reply-To: <20020423113935.A30329@openminds.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org check the MAC address of the two cards cards ! i am also using similar configuration but am not getting any thing like that ! rpm On Tuesday 23 April 2002 03:09 pm, Frank Louwers wrote: > Hi, > > We recently stummed across a rather annoying bug when 2 nics are on > the same network. > > Our situation is this: we have a server with 2 nics, each with a > different IP on the same network, connected to the same switch. Let's > assume eth0 has ip 1.2.3.1 and eth1 has 1.2.3.2, with a both with a > netmask of 255.255.255.0. > > Now the strange thing is that traffic for 1.2.3.2 arrives at eth0 no > matter what! > > Even if we disconnect the cable for eth1, 1.2.3.2 still replies to > pings, ssh, web, ... > > We tested this on IA32 architecture, different 2.4.x kernels and > different nics ... > > Is this a bug or a known issue? If it is not a bug, how can it be > solved? > > Kind Regards, > Frank Louwers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/