Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754022Ab0DIO4e (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:56:34 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f197.google.com ([209.85.223.197]:36700 "EHLO mail-iw0-f197.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753936Ab0DIO4d (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:56:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:subject:to:cc:in-reply-to:references; b=wXtvAxaUVbexDnVxM0LoQ/aTY8FgGhX259l1tVW5ImmUqnewppkO4vVz+SO3gBOUg2 oum3UL3HJECOsdk77RXC/Eg5y48UrVHCoAD41Toa3ONNt26uw49t7PA6m3L3oE6WpbhW 0Jh5QzDpF78+s+uuQNwdhEadfhmOqTDfxZLE0= Message-ID: <4bbf401e.a3b9e70a.13f3.4460@mx.google.com> Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:56:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Ben Gamari Subject: Re: Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing To: Andi Kleen Cc: Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, npiggin@suse.de, mingo@elte.hu, Ruald Andreae , Jens Axboe , Olly Betts , martin f krafft In-Reply-To: <87y6hcyu85.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> References: <4b9fa440.12135e0a.7fc8.ffffe745@mx.google.com> <4baeaee5.c5c2f10a.7187.2688@mx.google.com> <20100327204233.0d84542a@infradead.org> <4baf624c.48c3f10a.16d0.ffffccb8@mx.google.com> <87y6hcyu85.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 577 Lines: 14 On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:08:58 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Ben Gamari writes: > ext4/XFS/JFS/btrfs should be better in this regard > I am using btrfs, so yes, I was expecting things to be better. Unfortunately, the improvement seems to be non-existent under high IO/fsync load. - Ben -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/