Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751375Ab0DJHBx (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:01:53 -0400 Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org ([213.95.27.120]:42628 "EHLO ganesha.gnumonks.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750982Ab0DJHBv (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:01:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 08:34:32 +0200 From: Harald Welte To: Florian Tobias Schandinat Cc: Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, JosephChan@via.com.tw, ScottFang@viatech.com.cn, Deepak Saxena , linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] viafb: Do not probe for LVDS/TMDS on OLPC XO-1.5 Message-ID: <20100410063431.GR14576@prithivi.gnumonks.org> References: <1270746946-12467-1-git-send-email-corbet@lwn.net> <1270746946-12467-9-git-send-email-corbet@lwn.net> <4BBF9EE7.50707@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BBF9EE7.50707@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1761 Lines: 38 Hi Florian, On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:40:55PM +0200, Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote: > >The i2c transactions involved in detecting LVDS (9 seconds) and TMDS > >(16 seconds) add an extra 25 seconds to viafb load time on the XO-1.5. > > I don't like the idea of OLPC specific code. Isn't there any way to > speed this up in general? I'm quite sure it can be sped up at least a bit... however: > There is not yet even an option for OLPC_XO_1_5 (in contrast to > CONFIG_OLPC) in mainline. Is such a thing planned? > I can't really see anything that would speak for accepting this > patch now in current mainline, sorry. I think there is little choice in this matter. It is a _very_ uncommon hardware design decision to attach anything but the DDC to one of the I2C ports of the graphics chip, and the assumption that there is only DDC connected is made in VIA's BIOS (not used in OLPC), the linux framebuffer driver, as well as VIA's own Xorg driver and I believe as well in OpenChrome, too :( OLPC has told me that the particular chip that is attached to I2C is also very timing sensitive and not 100% I2C compliant, so I think it is the safe choice to not try to do DDC on that port for the OLPC 1.5. -- - Harald Welte http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/