Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:46:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:46:49 -0500 Received: from ppp0.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.3]:33288 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:46:35 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: georgn@somanetworks.com cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@wind.enjellic.com, sct@redhat.com Subject: Re: linux-2.4.0-test11 and sysklogd-1.3-31 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Dec 2000 11:30:06 CDT." <14897.3214.38818.625199@somanetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 09:16:01 +1100 Message-ID: <4977.976313761@ocs3.ocs-net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:30:06 -0500 (EST), "Georg Nikodym" wrote: >But since you seem to and while we're doing extreme surgery, why have >klogd at all? Every other unix, kernel messages are handled by the >syslog system. What problem did klogd solve and does that problem >still exist today? klogd maps the kernel messages from text to syslog levels and does some fiddling with kernel log levels at start up. It needs to be more than a simple 'cat'. When symbol handling was added to klogd, ksymoops was built into the kernel and very unreliable. Since then ksymoops has been moved to a separate package and is now reliable. Alas oops handling in sysklogd has not kept up to date and is now the problem area. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/