Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:55:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:55:46 -0400 Received: from mail44-s.fg.online.no ([148.122.161.44]:7866 "EHLO mail44.fg.online.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:55:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:55:59 +0200 From: Dag Bakke To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BUG: 2 NICs on same network Message-ID: <20020423165559.G18305@dagb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 11:39:35AM +0200, Frank Louwers wrote: > Our situation is this: we have a server with 2 nics, each with a > different IP on the same network, connected to the same switch. Let's > assume eth0 has ip 1.2.3.1 and eth1 has 1.2.3.2, with a both with a > netmask of 255.255.255.0. > > Now the strange thing is that traffic for 1.2.3.2 arrives at eth0 no > matter what! > > Even if we disconnect the cable for eth1, 1.2.3.2 still replies to > pings, ssh, web, ... Do: netstat -rn and you will (should?) understand why. See: /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt to (possibly) achieve what you want.. Dag B - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/