Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:29:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:29:20 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-038-128.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.38.128]:33957 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:29:18 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Larry McVoy , Roman Zippel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:29:42 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020422123924.A6638@havoc.gtf.org> <20020423075103.A25771@work.bitmover.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 23 April 2002 16:51, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 03:49:50PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > > Free speech is really not at danger here. The problem is something > > completely different. Linux is still a free software project and the > > question is how seriously do we take this? > > You might stop and ask yourself how the people who work on this free > software project pay the bills. I remember a recent converation with > Daniel where I said "if you work there, your work won't be GPLed" and > he replied "No problem". It's interesting how quickly he lost his GPL > rules when he wanted a job. Larry, it's a low blow and I resent it. Retraction please. Since you are smug about that, please inquire what my actual position is with regard to upholding the GPL. You know who to ask. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/