Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:47:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:47:09 -0400 Received: from [62.245.135.174] ([62.245.135.174]:43689 "EHLO mail.teraport.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:47:07 -0400 Message-ID: <3CC581F5.2FBEA0C1@TeraPort.de> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:47:01 +0200 From: Martin Knoblauch Reply-To: m.knoblauch@TeraPort.de Organization: TeraPort GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre5-ac3 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Lord CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: XFS in the main kernel In-Reply-To: <3CC56355.E5086E46@TeraPort.de> <3CC56FE9.1080303@sgi.com> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on lotus/Teraport/de(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 04/23/2002 05:47:01 PM, Serialize by Router on lotus/Teraport/de(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 04/23/2002 05:47:07 PM, Serialize complete at 04/23/2002 05:47:07 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Lord wrote: > > Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > > > > definitely. Unless XFS is in the mainline kernel (marked as > >experimantal if necessary) it will not get good exposure. > > > > The most important (only) reason I do not use it (and recommend our > >customers against using it) is that at the moment it is impossible to > >track both the kernel and XFS at the same time. This is a shame, because > >I think that for some application XFS is superior to the other > >alternatives (can be said about the other alternatives to :-). > > > > You would be surprised about the level of exposure XFS is getting, a lot > more > than you might realize. It is in everything from settop boxes and fiber > channel > switches to NAS boxes, those folks in general do not want to advertise. > Here are > a few larger scale installations out there: > > http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/xfs_users.html > > Steve Steve, no question that those are seriour users that give you serious feedback. And if you call that exposure, I am not going to argue. It is your project, it is your marketing. (And *I* am not going to argue about SGI marketing :-( From a mainline point of view XFS on Linux will only be successfull if it is "in the kernel". Fully maintained and "Linus approved". I am not sure when SGI started the port (could even go back to the time when I worked for them, late 1997). Definitely quite some time. By now it should be in the kernel. Maybe marked "experimental". As I see it now EXT3, ReiserFS and maybe JFS are just eating the XFS lunch away. In any case, the Vanderbilt comment is right on. Martin -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309 C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/