Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752612Ab0DMIo7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:44:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30767 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752514Ab0DMIo5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:44:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4BC42FE0.4040601@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:48:32 +0800 From: Cong Wang User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091001) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tetsuo Handa CC: opurdila@ixiacom.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, davem@davemloft.net, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers References: <20100412100744.5302.92442.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20100412100816.5302.74919.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <201004130121.o3D1Lhh7099571@www262.sakura.ne.jp> <4BC41994.7030707@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4BC41994.7030707@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1601 Lines: 54 Cong Wang wrote: > Tetsuo Handa wrote: >> Hello. >> >>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c >>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c >>> @@ -1980,6 +1980,8 @@ retry: >>> /* FIXME: add proper port randomization per like inet_csk_get_port */ >>> do { >>> ret = idr_get_new_above(ps, bind_list, next_port, &port); >>> + if (!ret && inet_is_reserved_local_port(port)) >>> + ret = -EAGAIN; >>> } while ((ret == -EAGAIN) && idr_pre_get(ps, GFP_KERNEL)); >>> >>> if (ret) >>> >> I think above part is wrong. Below program > ... >> This result suggests that above loop will continue until idr_pre_get() fails >> due to out of memory if all ports were reserved. >> >> Also, if idr_get_new_above() returned 0, bind_list (which is a kmalloc()ed >> pointer) is already installed into a free slot (see comment on >> idr_get_new_above_int()). Thus, simply calling idr_get_new_above() again will >> install the same pointer into multiple slots. I guess it will malfunction later. > > Thanks for testing! > > How about: > > + if (!ret && inet_is_reserved_local_port(port)) > + ret = -EBUSY; > > ? So that it will break the loop and return error. > Or use the similar trick: int tries = 10; ... if(!ret && inet_is_reserved_local_port(port)) { if (tries--) ret = -EAGAIN; else ret = -EBUSY; } Any comments? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/