Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753410Ab0DMQc0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:32:26 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:33223 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753302Ab0DMQcZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:32:25 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,198,1270450800"; d="scan'208";a="265157689" From: "Sean Hefty" To: "'Tetsuo Handa'" , , Cc: , , , , , , References: <20100412100744.5302.92442.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20100412100816.5302.74919.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <201004130121.o3D1Lhh7099571@www262.sakura.ne.jp> <4BC41994.7030707@redhat.com> <4BC42FE0.4040601@redhat.com> <201004132207.GAJ52684.OJFtMQVFHOSFLO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Subject: RE: [Patch 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:32:22 -0700 Message-ID: <21DAC78125424ED291B5D6477CFF9657@amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcrbCkI/ai0piY/8RCejW5vd1CL7OgAG2xmw In-Reply-To: <201004132207.GAJ52684.OJFtMQVFHOSFLO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 587 Lines: 14 >Sean and Roland, is below patch correct? >inet_is_reserved_local_port() is the new function proposed in this patchset. It looks correct to me. I didn't test the patch series, but if I comment out the call to inet_is_reserved_local_port() in the provided below, the changes worked fine for me. Acked-by: Sean Hefty -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/