Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753994Ab0DNAlT (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:41:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:54809 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751883Ab0DNAlS (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:41:18 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=dx2APfyvxrFoNX/8R6kxMlIwTxv7jtPqqeVi13yzsMS8jxtZcS0PzDzL7jziJFAM09 T71LEZXug+DSi2Mt8Kg5+07O2BjWrBGPyG9z4xPkb+sVZlmPHb9+3IDAK6aRY4Pbu7TZ fVT+f0J3/O7pjyxi6JjPnCa1CuGnGgJFjpCSA= Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:41:16 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix accidentally preprocessed snprintf callback Message-ID: <20100414004115.GI5602@nowhere> References: <1271205468-8202-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1271205468-8202-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1204 Lines: 33 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:37:48AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > struct sort_entry has a callback named snprintf that turns an > entry into a string result. > > But there are glibc versions that implement snprintf through a > macro. The following expression is then going to get the snprintf > call preprocessed: > > ent->snprintf(...) > > to finally end up in a build error: > > util/hist.c: Dans la fonction ?hist_entry__snprintf? : > util/hist.c:539: erreur: ?struct sort_entry? has no member named ?__builtin___snprintf_chk? > > To fix this, rename struct sort_entry::snprintf() callback to > to_string(), assuming at least Java methods naming won't ever > conflict with perf. Note I'm not entirely happy with this to_string() renaming. May be append_string() would have been better. I don't know. snprintf() was just too good. If you think about something else, don't hesistate to change, or I can change it myself if you want. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/