Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754201Ab0DNIT4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:19:56 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56363 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752433Ab0DNITy (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:19:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:19:52 +0200 From: Jan Blunck To: Jan Kara Cc: tytso@mit.edu, Linux-Kernel Mailinglist , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Arnd Bergmann , Andi Kleen , OGAWA Hirofumi Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ext2: Add ext2_sb_info s_lock spinlock Message-ID: <20100414081952.GR10776@bolzano.suse.de> References: <1271104905-8804-1-git-send-email-jblunck@suse.de> <1271104905-8804-6-git-send-email-jblunck@suse.de> <20100413190948.GC3250@quack.wifi.zluty.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100413190948.GC3250@quack.wifi.zluty.cz> Organization: SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6907 Lines: 178 On Tue, Apr 13, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 12-04-10 22:41:45, Jan Blunck wrote: > > Add a spinlock that protects against concurrent modifications of > > s_mount_state, s_blocks_last, s_overhead_last and the content of the > > superblock's buffer pointed to by sbi->s_es. This is a preparation patch > > for removing the BKL from ext2 in the next patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck > > Cc: Andi Kleen > > Cc: Jan Kara > > Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi > > --- > > fs/ext2/inode.c | 2 ++ > > fs/ext2/super.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > include/linux/ext2_fs_sb.h | 6 ++++++ > > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c > >index fc13cc1..5d15442 100644 > >--- a/fs/ext2/inode.c > >+++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c > >@@ -1407,9 +1407,11 @@ static int __ext2_write_inode(struct inode *inode, int do_sync) > > * created, add a flag to the superblock. > > */ > > lock_kernel(); > >+ spin_lock(&EXT2_SB(sb)->s_lock); > > ext2_update_dynamic_rev(sb); > > EXT2_SET_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb, > > EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE); > >+ spin_unlock(&EXT2_SB(sb)->s_lock); > > unlock_kernel(); > > ext2_write_super(sb); > > } > Looking at this - probably we should protect by this lock also setting of > a feature in ext2_xattr_update_super_block(). It's an unrelated bugfix but > when we are already doing the bugfixing & cleanups in this area... > > > diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c > > index b01c491..34d7a62 100644 > > --- a/fs/ext2/super.c > > +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c > > @@ -209,6 +216,7 @@ static int ext2_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct vfsmount *vfs) > > struct ext2_super_block *es = sbi->s_es; > > unsigned long def_mount_opts; > > > > + spin_lock(&sbi->s_lock); > > def_mount_opts = le32_to_cpu(es->s_default_mount_opts); > > > > if (sbi->s_sb_block != 1) > > @@ -281,6 +289,7 @@ static int ext2_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct vfsmount *vfs) > > if (!test_opt(sb, RESERVATION)) > > seq_puts(seq, ",noreservation"); > > > > + spin_unlock(&sbi->s_lock); > > return 0; > > } > Why exactly do you have in the above? Probably because of consistent > view of mount options? You should comment about that in the changelo and > especially at the lock declaration in ext2_fs.h. > > > @@ -1158,19 +1173,22 @@ static void ext2_sync_super(struct super_block *sb, struct ext2_super_block *es) > > * may have been checked while mounted and e2fsck may have > > * set s_state to EXT2_VALID_FS after some corrections. > > */ > > - > > static int ext2_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait) > > { > > + struct ext2_sb_info *sbi = EXT2_SB(sb); > > struct ext2_super_block *es = EXT2_SB(sb)->s_es; > > struct buffer_head *sbh = EXT2_SB(sb)->s_sbh; > > > > lock_kernel(); > > + spin_lock(&sbi->s_lock); > > if (es->s_state & cpu_to_le16(EXT2_VALID_FS)) { > > ext2_debug("setting valid to 0\n"); > > es->s_state &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT2_VALID_FS); > > + spin_unlock(&sbi->s_lock); > > ext2_sync_super(sb, es); > > } else { > > ext2_commit_super(sb, es); > > + spin_unlock(&sbi->s_lock); > Could you please fold in ext2_commit_super? It's used only here and it's > name looks a bit scary to be called under the spinlock... Right. Is there actually a reason why we don't update the s_free_blocks_count and s_free_inodes_count when we found the filesystem did not have the EXT2_VALID_FS set? Otherwise I could use ext2_sync_super() in both and make it honor the wait flag by just calling sync_dirty_buffer() when it is necessary. What do you think? diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c index 40fc8d5..8187061 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/super.c +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ #include "xip.h" static void ext2_sync_super(struct super_block *sb, - struct ext2_super_block *es); + struct ext2_super_block *es, int wait); static int ext2_remount (struct super_block * sb, int * flags, char * data); static int ext2_statfs (struct dentry * dentry, struct kstatfs * buf); static int ext2_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait); @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ void ext2_error (struct super_block * sb, const char * function, if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) { sbi->s_mount_state |= EXT2_ERROR_FS; es->s_state |= cpu_to_le16(EXT2_ERROR_FS); - ext2_sync_super(sb, es); + ext2_sync_super(sb, es, 1); } va_start(args, fmt); @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void ext2_put_super (struct super_block * sb) struct ext2_super_block *es = sbi->s_es; es->s_state = cpu_to_le16(sbi->s_mount_state); - ext2_sync_super(sb, es); + ext2_sync_super(sb, es, 1); } db_count = sbi->s_gdb_count; for (i = 0; i < db_count; i++) @@ -1127,23 +1127,16 @@ static void ext2_clear_super_error(struct super_block *sb) } } -static void ext2_commit_super (struct super_block * sb, - struct ext2_super_block * es) -{ - ext2_clear_super_error(sb); - es->s_wtime = cpu_to_le32(get_seconds()); - mark_buffer_dirty(EXT2_SB(sb)->s_sbh); - sb->s_dirt = 0; -} - -static void ext2_sync_super(struct super_block *sb, struct ext2_super_block *es) +static void ext2_sync_super(struct super_block *sb, struct ext2_super_block *es, + int wait) { ext2_clear_super_error(sb); es->s_free_blocks_count = cpu_to_le32(ext2_count_free_blocks(sb)); es->s_free_inodes_count = cpu_to_le32(ext2_count_free_inodes(sb)); es->s_wtime = cpu_to_le32(get_seconds()); mark_buffer_dirty(EXT2_SB(sb)->s_sbh); - sync_dirty_buffer(EXT2_SB(sb)->s_sbh); + if (wait) + sync_dirty_buffer(EXT2_SB(sb)->s_sbh); sb->s_dirt = 0; } @@ -1167,11 +1160,8 @@ static int ext2_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait) if (es->s_state & cpu_to_le16(EXT2_VALID_FS)) { ext2_debug("setting valid to 0\n"); es->s_state &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT2_VALID_FS); - ext2_sync_super(sb, es); - } else { - ext2_commit_super(sb, es); } - sb->s_dirt = 0; + ext2_sync_super(sb, es, wait); unlock_kernel(); return 0; @@ -1269,7 +1259,7 @@ static int ext2_remount (struct super_block * sb, int * flags, char * data) if (!ext2_setup_super (sb, es, 0)) sb->s_flags &= ~MS_RDONLY; } - ext2_sync_super(sb, es); + ext2_sync_super(sb, es, 1); unlock_kernel(); return 0; restore_opts: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/