Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756210Ab0DNTfK (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:35:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42330 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755917Ab0DNTfD (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:35:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:34:19 -0400 From: Jason Baron To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, andi@firstfloor.org, roland@redhat.com, rth@redhat.com, mhiramat@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] jump label v6 Message-ID: <20100414193419.GC2747@redhat.com> References: <20100413165659.GA23931@Krystal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100413165659.GA23931@Krystal> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1648 Lines: 45 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:56:59PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Jason Baron (jbaron@redhat.com) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Refresh of jump labeling patches aginst -tip tree. For bacground see: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125858436505941&w=2 > > > > I believe I've addressed all the reviews from v5. > > Hi Jason, > > I would appreciate if you could add pointers to the Immediate Values > benchmarks (or possibly some benchmark information altogether) and a > notice that some parts of the design are inspired from Immediate Values > in the jump label code. > > I recognise that you did great work on getting jump label in shape both > at the Linux kernel and gcc level, but it's usually appropriate to > acknowledge prior work it is based on. Only then can I justify that > Immediate Values have been useful in the whole process. > So I've been doing micro-benchmarks measuring the cycles involved when the tracepoints are disabled. As quoted from the above pointer: "As discussed in pervious mails I've seen an average improvement of 30 cycles per-tracepoint on x86_64 systems that I've tested." I can post my test harness if you are interested. If there are any other benchmarks of interest please let me know. I am planning to add a Docmentation/ file for jump labels, so I can add about the previous Immediate value work, which certainly has been useful. thanks, -Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/