Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:24:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:24:19 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:34824 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:24:18 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:23:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Pavel Machek cc: Rob Landley , Alexander Viro , Ian Molton , Subject: Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... In-Reply-To: <20020421230842.E155@toy.ucw.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Pavel Machek wrote: > > I believe -pre's are still important. Daily snapshots are too likely to be > broken, and "real" releases are different from -pre ones (with *usefull* > difference): you can ignore -pre release, but you can't ignore real release > (because real releases are relative to each other). Considering how even real releases in the development tree are likely to be broken (never mind the _trivial_ brokenness of applying the same patch to init/main.c twice, I'm talking about the more fundamental brokenness of just broken drivers and filesystems due to development), I'm not sure how big a deal that is. And I do make full tar-files of real releases, so that people can skip a few (although unless you have a fast connection it usually only makes sense after 10 full releases or so). > Having slightly more frequent real releases would be nice, but I believe > it is not feasible to make them as common as pre- patches. I'll try to keep them coming a bit more often. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/