Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S310835AbSDXJnD>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 05:43:03 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S311025AbSDXJnC>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 05:43:02 -0400
Received: from dsl-213-023-038-128.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.38.128]:3499 "EHLO
	starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S310835AbSDXJnB>;
	Wed, 24 Apr 2002 05:43:01 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
        Dieter N?tzel <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
Subject: Re: 2.4: Any plans for new bootmem and waitq patches?
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:42:43 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200204240013.53960.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <20020424003222.GK21206@holomorphy.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Message-Id: <E16zwot-0002N7-00@starship>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday 24 April 2002 02:32, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> The bootmem patch's benefits are not very visible (if at all) for
> machines other than simulators and some unusual large systems. I
> am not pressing for its inclusion in mainline for the basic reason
> that what it addresses does not affect the systems I'm using anymore,
> if only because the systems changed. =)

What changed exactly?

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/