Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753142Ab0DQRIQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:08:16 -0400 Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:56522 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752727Ab0DQRIP (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:08:15 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:08:08 -0400 From: tytso@mit.edu To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Salman , mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, arjan@infradead.org, csadler@google.com, ranjitm@google.com, kenchen@google.com, dawnchen@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping Message-ID: <20100417170808.GE32634@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: tytso@mit.edu, Peter Zijlstra , Salman , mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, arjan@infradead.org, csadler@google.com, ranjitm@google.com, kenchen@google.com, dawnchen@google.com References: <20100413234902.29004.41655.stgit@bumblebee1.mtv.corp.google.com> <1271317886.32749.69.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1271317886.32749.69.camel@laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1151 Lines: 23 On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:51:26AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 17:08 -0700, Salman wrote: > > As we discussed earlier this year, Google has an implementation that it > > would like to share. I have finally gotten around to porting it to > > v2.6.33 and cleaning up the interfaces. It is provided in the following > > messages for your review. I realize that when we first discussed this > > idea, a lot of ideas were presented for enhancing it. Thanks alot for > > your suggestions. I haven't gotten around to implementing any of them. > > .33 is way too old to submit patches against. But it's not too old for review purposes; as Salman said, they were sent to LKML for comments and review. I think it's well understood that when these patches are ready to be merged, they need to be submitted right before the merge window opens, against a recent -rc kernel. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/