Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:03:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:03:23 -0400 Received: from viruswall.epcnet.de ([62.132.156.25]:11789 "HELO viruswall.epcnet.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:03:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:03:19 +0200 From: jd@epcnet.de To: davem@redhat.com Subject: AW: Re: AW: Re: VLAN and Network Drivers 2.4.x Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <721506265.avixxmail@nexxnet.epcnet.de> In-Reply-To: <20020424.093515.82125943.davem@redhat.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: avixxmail 1.2.2.7 X-MAIL-FROM: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Von: > Gesendet: 24.04.2002 18:45 > > There actually is a flag the driver can set fo this purpose. Oh. Even in 2.4 ? > Someone should walk over all the drivers that are known to not > work currently with VLAN and for them to set the > NETIF_F_VLAN_CHALLENGED flag. That's a good idea. So vconfig could check, if its possible to create a VLAN on top of such a driver - and issue a message if not. > Another idea, is to do the opposite, set that flag by default and > clear it in drivers that we know it works. It depends - if all drivers must be changed or just those, who support VLAN. I tend to a solution where just the VLAN-capable drivers should be changed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/