Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752628Ab0DSHjL (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:39:11 -0400 Received: from buzzloop.caiaq.de ([212.112.241.133]:57807 "EHLO buzzloop.caiaq.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752328Ab0DSHjG (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:39:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:38:59 +0200 From: Daniel Mack To: Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, bryan.wu@canonical.com, r.herring@freescale.com, Jun.Li@freescale.com, xiao-lizhang@freescale.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2.6.34-rc4 5/7] mxc: Add generic USB HW initialization for MX51 Message-ID: <20100419073859.GA30801@buzzloop.caiaq.de> References: <1271445371-18501-1-git-send-email-Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com> <1271445371-18501-2-git-send-email-Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com> <1271445371-18501-3-git-send-email-Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com> <1271445371-18501-4-git-send-email-Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com> <1271445371-18501-5-git-send-email-Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com> <20100417170706.GY30801@buzzloop.caiaq.de> <20100419010340.GB15308@matterhorn.verdurent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100419010340.GB15308@matterhorn.verdurent.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1317 Lines: 36 On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 04:03:40AM +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On 10 Apr 17, Daniel Mack wrote: > > > @@ -18,6 +19,7 @@ > > > > > > #include > > > #include > > > +#include > > > > > > #include > > > #include > > > @@ -50,9 +52,14 @@ > > > #define MX35_H1_TLL_BIT (1 << 5) > > > #define MX35_H1_USBTE_BIT (1 << 4) > > > > > > -int mxc_set_usbcontrol(int port, unsigned int flags) > > > +int mxc_intialize_usb_hw(int port, unsigned int flags) > > > > This patch and the next one should be merged into one. The reason is > > that you rename a function here and the next patch follows that change. > > Especially when bisecting, this can lead to uncompilable checkouts of > > the tree when stopping in the middle. > > Also, patch 3 really belongs with this patch too since the #defines in > patch 3 are used here. Well, as long as the defines are commited _before_ their users, it should be fine. But they can also be squashed into one, that's true. Thanks, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/