Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 12:21:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 12:20:58 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:31504 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 12:20:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was: To: andrewm@uow.edu.au (Andrew Morton) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 17:20:44 +0100 (BST) Cc: kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp, ak@suse.de (Andi Kleen), viro@math.psu.edu (Alexander Viro), jmerkey@timpanogas.org (Jeff V. Merkey), riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, okir@monad.swb.de (Olaf Kirch) In-Reply-To: <39FAF4C6.3BB04774@uow.edu.au> from "Andrew Morton" at Oct 29, 2000 02:46:14 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The big question is: why is Apache using file locking so > much? Is this normal behaviour for Apache? Apache uses file locking to serialize accept on hosts where accept either has bad thundering heard problems or was simply broken with multiple acceptors - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/