Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752666Ab0DSJWo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:22:44 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.89]:40725 "EHLO fmsmga101.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752067Ab0DSJWm (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:22:42 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,234,1270450800"; d="scan'208";a="559237473" Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] perf & kvm: Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side From: "Zhang, Yanmin" To: Avi Kivity Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Sheng Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , oerg Roedel , Jes Sorensen , Gleb Natapov , Zachary Amsden , zhiteng.huang@intel.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo In-Reply-To: <4BCC1B82.5050000@redhat.com> References: <1271655161.2078.603.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> <4BCC1665.1080003@redhat.com> <1271667323.2078.611.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> <4BCC1B82.5050000@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:22:21 +0800 Message-Id: <1271668941.2078.613.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.0 (2.28.0-2.fc12) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1317 Lines: 38 On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 11:59 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 04/19/2010 11:55 AM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 11:37 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > >> On 04/19/2010 08:32 AM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > >> > >>> Below patch introduces perf_guest_info_callbacks and related register/unregister > >>> functions. Add more PERF_RECORD_MISC_XXX bits meaning guest kernel and guest user > >>> space. > >>> > >>> > >> This doesn't apply against upstream. > >> > > What does upstream mean here? The vanilla 2.6.34-rc4? > > > > Yes, sorry for being unclear. > > >> What branch was this generated > >> against? > >> > >> > > It's against the latest tip/master. I checked out to 19b26586090 as the latest > > tip/master has some updates on perf. > > > > I don't want to merge tip/master... does tip/perf/core contain the > needed updates? I think so. A moment ago, I checked out to b5a80b7e9 of tip/perf/core. All 3 patches could be applied cleanly and compilation is ok. A quick testing shows tip/perf/core kernel does work. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/