Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:51:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:51:24 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:23735 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:50:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:49:18 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Dieter N?tzel , Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: 2.4: Any plans for new bootmem and waitq patches? Message-ID: <20020424174918.GL21206@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Daniel Phillips , Dieter N?tzel , Linux Kernel List In-Reply-To: <200204240013.53960.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <20020424003222.GK21206@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 24 April 2002 02:32, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> The bootmem patch's benefits are not very visible (if at all) for >> machines other than simulators and some unusual large systems. I >> am not pressing for its inclusion in mainline for the basic reason >> that what it addresses does not affect the systems I'm using anymore, >> if only because the systems changed. =) On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 11:42:43AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > What changed exactly? I don't use the affected systems anymore. I moved from one group to another within my company just before the beginning of the year. Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/