Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754963Ab0DSNC6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:02:58 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:35756 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754663Ab0DSNC4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:02:56 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support From: David Woodhouse To: Jan Blunck Cc: Valerie Aurora , Alexander Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Tso , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20100419124025.GG10776@bolzano.suse.de> References: <1271372682-21225-5-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com> <1271372682-21225-6-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com> <1271372682-21225-7-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com> <1271372682-21225-8-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com> <1271372682-21225-9-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com> <1271372682-21225-10-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com> <1271372682-21225-11-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com> <1271372682-21225-12-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com> <1271372682-21225-13-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com> <1271372682-21225-14-git-send-email-vaurora@redhat.com> <20100419124025.GG10776@bolzano.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:02:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1271682168.14748.718.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-1.fc12) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1192 Lines: 29 On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 14:40 +0200, Jan Blunck wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, Valerie Aurora wrote: > > > Add support for fallthru directory entries to ext2. > > > > XXX - Makes up inode number for fallthru entry > > XXX - Might be better implemented as special symlinks > > Better not. David Woodhouse actually convinced me of moving away from the > special symlink approach. The whiteouts have been implemented as special > symlinks before. I certainly asked whether you really need a real 'struct inode' for whiteouts, and suggested that they should be represented _purely_ as a dentry with type DT_WHT. I don't much like the manifestation of that in this patch though, especially with the made-up inode number. (ISTR I had other jffs2-specific objections too, which I'll dig out and forward). -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/