Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:07:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:07:25 -0400 Received: from [195.163.186.27] ([195.163.186.27]:32388 "EHLO zmailer.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:07:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:07:23 +0300 From: Matti Aarnio To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Ben Greear , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: VLAN and Network Drivers 2.4.x Message-ID: <20020424210723.L1284@mea-ext.zmailer.org> In-Reply-To: <20020424.093515.82125943.davem@redhat.com> <721506265.avixxmail@nexxnet.epcnet.de> <20020424.095951.43413800.davem@redhat.com> <3CC6EBF1.9060902@candelatech.com> <20020424134933.A17852@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:49:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: ... > The tulip patch is butt-ugly - the oversized allocation isn't needed, > and it just flat-out turns off large packet protection. That's really > not what you want to do, even for the best tulip cards. If an oversized > gram (non-VLAN) makes it into a network which such a patched tulip > driver, you can DoS. It all depends... At least the cisco switches I have used have protection by controlling on how large frames you can send, and having automatic enlarging of frame size for VLAN Trunking port. Of course those switches have some amounts of "jumbogram support" as well at port by port basis. So perhaps you can DoS your machine off the net (or your stream very least), but not other machines. > Jeff /Matti Aarnio - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/