Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754246Ab0DTJfZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:35:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23762 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754189Ab0DTJfX (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:35:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4BCD7557.9090502@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:35:19 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcelo Tosatti CC: Glauber Costa , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zachary Amsden Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add a global synchronization point for pvclock References: <1271356648-5108-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1271356648-5108-2-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <4BC8CA52.4090703@goop.org> <20100419142624.GE14158@mothafucka.localdomain> <4BCC829A.6000803@goop.org> <20100419182542.GI14158@mothafucka.localdomain> <20100420015733.GA28249@amt.cnet> In-Reply-To: <20100420015733.GA28249@amt.cnet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1411 Lines: 31 On 04/20/2010 04:57 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > >> Marcelo can probably confirm it, but he has a nehalem with an appearently >> very good tsc source. Even this machine warps. >> >> It stops warping if we only write pvclock data structure once and forget it, >> (which only updated tsc_timestamp once), according to him. >> > Yes. So its not as if the guest visible TSCs go out of sync (they don't > on this machine Glauber mentioned, or even on a multi-core Core 2 Duo), > but the delta calculation is very hard (if not impossible) to get right. > > The timewarps i've seen were in the 0-200ns range, and very rare (once > every 10 minutes or so). > Might be due to NMIs or SMIs interrupting the rdtsc(); ktime_get() operation which establishes the timeline. We could limit it by having a loop doing rdtsc(); ktime_get(); rdtsc(); and checking for some bound, but it isn't worthwhile (and will break nested virtualization for sure). Better to have the option to calibrate kvmclock just once on machines with X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TRULY_RELIABLE _TSC_HONESTLY. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/