Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 03:29:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 03:29:04 -0400 Received: from pc3-camc5-0-cust13.cam.cable.ntl.com ([80.4.125.13]:6298 "EHLO fenrus.demon.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 03:29:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:26:01 +0100 Message-Id: <200204250726.g3P7Q1e14638@fenrus.demon.nl> From: arjan@fenrus.demon.nl To: Eric Sandeen cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] (repost) kmem_cache_zalloc In-Reply-To: <1019682472.15455.33.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> X-Newsgroups: fenrus.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.9-31 (i586)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <1019682472.15455.33.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> you wrote: > We'd like to incorporate this into the kernel proper, and several others > chimed in that it would be useful, so here's the patch. If it's a no-go > with Linus, we can roll this functionality back under fs/xfs to reduce > our changes in the mainline kernel. personally I liked the kcalloc suggesition more; that would fix a lot of multiplication exploitable bugs at the same time - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/