Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753186Ab0DTXIW (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:08:22 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:46104 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751142Ab0DTXIV (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:08:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:07:19 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Andrew Morton Cc: Marcelo Jimenez , Stephen Rothwell , Christoph Lameter , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Minchan Kim , KOSAKI Motohiro , "H. Peter Anvin" , Yinghai Lu , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Suspicious compilation warning Message-ID: <20100420230719.GB1432@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20100420155122.6f2c26eb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100420155122.6f2c26eb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1595 Lines: 41 On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 03:51:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:27:43 -0300 > Marcelo Jimenez wrote: > > > I get this warning while compiling for ARM/SA1100: > > > > mm/sparse.c: In function '__section_nr': > > mm/sparse.c:135: warning: 'root' is used uninitialized in this function > > > > With a small patch in fs/proc/meminfo.c, I find that NR_SECTION_ROOTS > > is zero, which certainly explains the warning. > > > > # cat /proc/meminfo > > NR_SECTION_ROOTS=0 > > NR_MEM_SECTIONS=32 > > SECTIONS_PER_ROOT=512 > > SECTIONS_SHIFT=5 > > MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS=32 > > hm, who owns sparsemem nowadays? Nobody identifiable. > > Does it make physical sense to have SECTIONS_PER_ROOT > NR_MEM_SECTIONS? Well, it'll be about this number on everything using sparsemem extreme: #define SECTIONS_PER_ROOT (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof (struct mem_section)) and with only 32 sections, this is going to give a NR_SECTION_ROOTS value of zero. I think the calculation of NR_SECTIONS_ROOTS is wrong. #define NR_SECTION_ROOTS (NR_MEM_SECTIONS / SECTIONS_PER_ROOT) Clearly if we have 1 mem section, we want to have one section root, so I think this division should round up any fractional part, thusly: #define NR_SECTION_ROOTS ((NR_MEM_SECTIONS + SECTIONS_PER_ROOT - 1) / SECTIONS_PER_ROOT) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/