Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:34:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:34:14 -0400 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:45564 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:34:14 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <20020425045120.6b63334e.spyro@armlinux.org> To: spyro@armlinux.org Cc: Rik van Riel , pavel@suse.cz, phillips@bonn-fries.net, lm@bitmover.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:33:31 +0100 Message-ID: <26143.1019741611@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org spyro@armlinux.org said: > Why SHOULD I download ten different architectures when I only want two > (ARM and X86).? Why SHOULD I download SCSI when I dont use anything > but IDE? (cost reasons) Why SHOULD I download bluetooth stuff when I > will probably wont own a bluetooth device in the near future? > Why dont you try to provide a satisfactory answer to those questions > instead of avoiding them and turning them around? Linus has categorically stated that he will not split up the kernel sources. The GPL gives you the freedom to fork the kernel and do so if you wish. Please do not continue this pointless debate here. You will not achieve anything which was not achieved in all the other numerous times some troll has brought it up. Do, or do not. There is no troll. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/