Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756058Ab0DUUDo (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:03:44 -0400 Received: from vms173017pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.17]:35763 "EHLO vms173017pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754112Ab0DUUDm (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:03:42 -0400 Message-id: <4BCF5A09.80404@acm.org> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:03:21 -0500 From: Corey Minyard User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090707) MIME-version: 1.0 To: Matthew Garrett Cc: openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, bjorn.helgaas@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipmi: Only register one si per bmc References: <1271788828-10231-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> <1271788828-10231-2-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> <4BCF3F69.3050003@acm.org> <20100421182154.GA16436@srcf.ucam.org> In-reply-to: <20100421182154.GA16436@srcf.ucam.org> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1459 Lines: 31 Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 01:09:45PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote: > > >> If I understand this correctly, this would really be "Only register one >> si per system". Unfortunately, there are systems that have more than >> one BMC each with their own interface. >> > > The spec explicitly says that while a system may have multiple BMCs, > only one BMC may respond to GetDeviceID (6.11 of the 2.0 spec). Is the > real world irritatingly incompatible with this? > That section is quite misleading. There may be management controllers that are not BMCs, and they may have system interfaces. There may only be on BMC in a system, though, per the spec. That really has more to do with event handling and the main SDR repository, though. However, IBM makes some systems that can plug together for scalability. Each individual system has a BMC, and when you plug them together into an SMP system, all the BMCs are still there. At least that's how I understand it. I'm not sure if the other BMCs become satellite MCs in that case, which would be legit, sort of. So I guess the answer to you question would be: "Yes, the world is not compatible with the spec". -corey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/