Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752570Ab0DVFgR (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:36:17 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56599 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750720Ab0DVFgQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:36:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100421.223620.257172362.davem@davemloft.net> To: tklein@de.ibm.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, themann@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][RESEND] ehea: error handling improvement From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <201004211110.55986.tklein@de.ibm.com> References: <201004211110.55986.tklein@de.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1083 Lines: 30 From: Thomas Klein Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:10:55 +0200 > Reset a port's resources only if they're actually in an error state > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Klein > --- > > Patch created against net-2.6 I thought you were sorry for wasting my time and that you were going to follow the directions I gave you last time, and I quote: -------------------- 3) These are not appropriate for net-2.6 as we are deep in the -rcX series at this point and only the most diabolical bug fixes are appropriate. Therefore, please generate these against net-next-2.6, thanks. -------------------- And here you are generating your patches against net-2.6. Heck, you even feel it's worth mentioning explicitly. Lucky for you the patches happen to apply cleanly to net-next-2.6 so I've put them there. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/