Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:21:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:21:11 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:7767 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:21:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:21:06 -0400 From: Pete Zaitcev To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zaitcev@redhat.com Subject: 1279 mounts Message-ID: <20020425162106.A30736@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I updated my patch that allows to mount unholy numbers of volumes. The old version was for 2.4.9 and did not apply anymore. I split the unnamed majors patch and the NFS patch. Also, CONFIG_ option is gone, because it made the code ugly. Majors part: http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/linux-2.4.19-pre7-unmaj.diff NFS part: http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/linux-2.4.19-pre7-nores.diff Userland for NFS: http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/util-linux-2.11q-nores1.diff Is anyone actually interested? Random people periodically ask me for patches, get them and disappear into the void. I hear nothing good or bad (well, nothing since Trond reviewed it several months ago, and also someone found a conflict with NFS server code, since fixed). I am thinking about submitting, but if users do not ask, why add extra bloat and negotiate with LANANA... -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/