Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:19:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:19:15 -0400 Received: from khms.westfalen.de ([62.153.201.243]:8669 "EHLO khms.westfalen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:19:15 -0400 Date: 25 Apr 2002 22:53:00 +0200 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <8NZtBMJXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: <20020422165327.A914@redhat.com> Subject: Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh9 R/C435 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org dledford@redhat.com (Doug Ledford) wrote on 22.04.02 in <20020422165327.A914@redhat.com>: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 10:29:19PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On Monday 22 April 2002 21:53, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:34:49PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > How about a URL instead? Any objection? > > > > > > Yes. Why should I have to cut and paste (assuming I'm in X) or > > > write down > > > > What??? What kind of system are you running? Err... redhat supports > > cut and paste I thought. <-- funnny. > > Depends on what you use to read the file containing the URL. Obviously, > if I'm Al Viro I'm on a text console and wouldn't use a mouse if you > cemented it in my hand, so cut and paste isn't an option. I have no idea about Al, but while I do spend most of my time on the console, I do use a mouse there for cut and paste. Long live gpm. > real docs, switch to X or install lynx on my system, go to URL. It's a You don't have lynx installed on a development machine?! *boggle* How about links? W3m? Hell, wget? > Those were the relevant points you blithely skipped because you know they > are true and hurt your position. Selective response is something you've > been practicing in this entire thread. The debating tactics used in this thread - on more than one side - are nothing to be proud about. Could we not try to figure out ways to make Linux better, instead of digging for ways to make each other look bad? MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/