Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758273Ab0DVUSs (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:18:48 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:59652 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758263Ab0DVUSj (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:18:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:17:48 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Randy Dunlap Cc: "John W. Linville" , Olivier Galibert , Joe Perches , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, LKML Subject: Re: What's the staging review and acceptance process? Message-ID: <20100422201748.GB26924@suse.de> References: <1271881967.1730.482.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20100422034532.GA25177@suse.de> <1271910357.1730.627.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20100422054902.GA28037@suse.de> <1271915718.1730.687.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20100422061242.GA28539@suse.de> <20100422064244.GA31653@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <20100422195852.GA2391@tuxdriver.com> <4BD0AC38.3090803@xenotime.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BD0AC38.3090803@xenotime.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1872 Lines: 42 On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:06:16PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > John W. Linville wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:42:45AM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:12:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > >>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:55:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > >>>> Not really, patchwork shows status immediately. > >>> Immediately when someone does something with it, right? So, the same as > >>> my development cycle? > >> I guess the main difference is that patchwork allows one contributor > >> to see that his patch has just not been checked yet, vs. missed/lost. > > > > In Greg's defense, I find patchwork to be fairly unwieldy (which is > > why I don't use it). It is certainly possible that I am missing some > > key feature, but my limited experience with it suggested to me that all > > the clicky-clicky stuff required to deal with the individual messages > > queued in patchwork nearly doubled my time overhead associated with > > merging patches. > > > Just from a patch submitter perspective, I'd like to see some kind of > response. I can believe what you say about patchwork, so I wouldn't > advocate it. > > I agree to Joe's perspective that Greg is overbooked regarding time. > I think that this is an ongoing problem, not just a current one that > will go away, so for me, the question is what is Greg willing to do > about it? Greg is not going to take up 3 months of his life and sell and buy a house and move. Seriously, that took up all of my "free" time, and it's now over, and I am catching up on things, give me a short ammount of time please. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/