Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758172Ab0DWQiS (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:38:18 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:49974 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758104Ab0DWQiN (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:38:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:37:36 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Eric Lescouet Cc: Alan Stern , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: USBIP (staging) driver's dependency on drivers/usb/core internal headers Message-ID: <20100423163736.GA5980@kroah.com> References: <20100423150734.GA7778@kroah.com> <20100423161455.GA21129@kroah.com> <4BD1CB60.20209@VirtualLogix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BD1CB60.20209@VirtualLogix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2685 Lines: 68 On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:31:28PM +0200, Eric Lescouet wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:52:26AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > >>On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Greg KH wrote: > >> > >>>On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:44:11PM +0200, Eric Lescouet wrote: > >>>>Hi, > >>>> > >>>>The USBIP modules (and some others) have a direct dependency on the following headers: > >>>>- drivers/usb/core/hdc.h (struct usb_hcd and various routines) > >>>>- drivers/usb/core/hub.h (couple of constants) > >>>>Because those headers are not part of include/, it makes it quite difficult > >>>>to compile them as standalone modules (e.g.: against pre-compiled kernel). > >>>Then don't do that :) > >>> > >>>>hdc.c and hub.c are relatively self-contained and could be moved to e.g.: include/linux/usb/. > >>>> > >>>>What do you think? > >>>I think the code needs to be cleaned up and merged to the main part of > >>>the kernel tree, then this wouldn't be an issue, right? > >>I think moving hub.h into include/linux/usb would be a good > >>thing. However, if this is done then the file contents should > >>be rearranged slightly: > >> > >> Everything from the "Hub request types" comment through the > >> various HUB_TTTT_* definitions (except the line declaring > >> struct usb_device) should be extracted into a separate file. > >> This new file could be called ch11.h (because it contains > >> constants and structures from Chapter 11 of the USB 2.0 spec, > >> just as ch9.h contains information from Chapter 9) or it > >> could keep the name hub.h. It could even be exported as > >> a userspace header file. > >> > >> The remainder (not very much) should be merged into hcd.h. > >> > >>Once that's done, moving hcd.h into include/linux/usb would be a > >>reasonable thing to do as well. It is shared between usbcore > >>and the HCDs, so it really does belong in a more public > >>location. > > > >Ok, fair enough. Patches are always welcome :) > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > If I understand correctly, splitting hub.h into hub.h + ch11.h is > independent of the move. At the end the 2 (or 3 files) would end up > into include/linux/usb/. > correct? > > I've tried to move hub.h and hcd.h and to compile the kernel, already. > Changing the path of the #include directives in ~40 files did the trick. 40 files need to be changed? wow. > Would you like 2 patches (move and then split) or only 1? Move and then split is fine. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/