Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:01:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:01:21 -0400 Received: from smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.141]:22033 "EHLO smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:01:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:01:07 +0200 From: Jurriaan on Alpha To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: PDC20265 / 2.5.10 / Alpha (Miata) - unexpected interrupt flood Message-ID: <20020426120107.GA9344@alpha.of.nowhere> Reply-To: thunder7@xs4all.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Message-Flag: Still using Outlook? Please Upgrade to real software! Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm running linux-2.5.10 on my Miata Alpha system, and I get a *lot* of messages like this: ide: unexpected interrupt 1 44 The limiting in drivers/ide/ide.c works fine, I never get more than 1 a second or something like that. Still, 1 per second is a lot. dmesg (system parameters/ide messages): Linux version 2.5.10 (root@alpha) (gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)) #1 Fri Apr 26 09:54:57 CEST 2002 Booting on Miata using machine vector Miata from SRM Command line: ro root=/dev/sda1 video=tdfx:1600x1200-16@85,nohwcursor memcluster 0, usage 1, start 0, end 236 memcluster 1, usage 0, start 236, end 196607 memcluster 2, usage 1, start 196607, end 196608 freeing pages 236:384 freeing pages 839:196607 reserving pages 839:842 pci: cia revision 1 (pyxis) On node 0 totalpages: 196607 zone(0): 196607 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/sda1 video=tdfx:1600x1200-16@85,nohwcursor HWRPB cycle frequency bogus. Estimated 499787208 Hz Calibrating delay loop... 990.32 BogoMIPS Memory: 1553416k/1572856k available (2280k kernel code, 17552k reserved, 676k data, 376k init) pci: passed tb register update test pci: passed sg loopback i/o read test pci: passed pte write cache snoop test pci: failed valid tag invalid pte reload test (mcheck; workaround available) pci: passed pci machine check test pci: tbia workaround enabled Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver ver.:7.0.0 ide: system bus speed 33MHz CMD Technology Inc PCI0646: IDE controller on PCI slot 00:04.0 CMD Technology Inc PCI0646: chipset revision 1 CMD Technology Inc PCI0646: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later CMD Technology Inc PCI0646: chipset revision 0x01, MultiWord DMA Limited, IRQ workaround enabled CMD Technology Inc PCI0646: simplex device: DMA disabled ide0: CMD Technology Inc PCI0646 Bus-Master DMA was disabled by BIOS CMD Technology Inc PCI0646: simplex device: DMA disabled ide1: CMD Technology Inc PCI0646 Bus-Master DMA was disabled by BIOS Promise Technology, Inc. 20265: IDE controller on PCI slot 01:0a.0 Promise Technology, Inc. 20265: chipset revision 2 Promise Technology, Inc. 20265: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later Promise Technology, Inc. 20265: ROM enabled at 0x20020000 Promise Technology, Inc. 20265: (U)DMA Burst Bit DISABLED Primary PCI Mode Secondary PCI Mode. Promise Technology, Inc. 20265: FORCING BURST BIT 0x00 -> 0x01 ACTIVE ide2: BM-DMA at 0x9000-0x9007, BIOS settings: hde:pio, hdf:pio ide3: BM-DMA at 0x9008-0x900f, BIOS settings: hdg:DMA, hdh:pio hdg: IBM-DTLA-307045, ATA DISK drive ide3 at 0x9048-0x904f,0x9056 on irq 44 hdg: 90069840 sectors (46116 MB) w/1916KiB Cache, CHS=89355/16/63, UDMA(100) Partition check: hdg: [PTBL] [5606/255/63] hdg1 hdg2 Has anything changed? I ran 2.4.x since 2.4.10 or so on this machine with the same hardware and never saw this message. Thanks, Jurriaan -- Linux hackers are funny people: They count the time in patchlevels. Gerd Knorr GNU/Linux 2.5.10 on Debian/Alpha 988 bogomips load:0.04 0.14 0.08 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/