Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751010Ab0DZEBm (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:01:42 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:57271 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750768Ab0DZEBk (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:01:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4BD50F63.1010008@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:58:27 +0800 From: Xiao Guangrong User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avi Kivity CC: Marcelo Tosatti , KVM list , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/10] KVM MMU: don't write-protect if have new mapping to unsync page References: <4BD3E306.4020202@cn.fujitsu.com> <4BD3E8AB.4020704@cn.fujitsu.com> <4BD412A0.1000101@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4BD412A0.1000101@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1736 Lines: 36 Avi Kivity wrote: > On 04/25/2010 10:00 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >> Two cases maybe happen in kvm_mmu_get_page() function: >> >> - one case is, the goal sp is already in cache, if the sp is unsync, >> we only need update it to assure this mapping is valid, but not >> mark it sync and not write-protect sp->gfn since it not broke unsync >> rule(one shadow page for a gfn) >> >> - another case is, the goal sp not existed, we need create a new sp >> for gfn, i.e, gfn (may)has another shadow page, to keep unsync rule, >> we should sync(mark sync and write-protect) gfn's unsync shadow page. >> After enabling multiple unsync shadows, we sync those shadow pages >> only when the new sp not allow to become unsync(also for the unsyc >> rule, the new rule is: allow all pte page become unsync) >> > > Another interesting case is to create new shadow pages in the unsync > state. That can help when the guest starts a short lived process: we > can avoid write protecting its pagetables completely. Even if we do > sync them, we can sync them in a batch instead of one by one, saving IPIs. IPI is needed when rmap_write_protect() changes mappings form writable to read-only, so while we sync all gfn's unsync page, only one IPI is needed. And, another problem is we call ramp_write_protect()/flush-local-tlb many times when sync gfn's unsync page, the same problem is in mmu_sync_children() function, could you allow me to improve it after this patchset? :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/