Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752903Ab0DZOuY (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:50:24 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:53199 "EHLO mail-bw0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751853Ab0DZOuW (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:50:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Allow regulator-regulator supplies to be specified by name From: Liam Girdwood To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1272291494-31682-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1272291494-31682-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:50:16 +0100 Message-ID: <1272293416.3208.75.camel@odin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 929 Lines: 27 On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 15:18 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > When one regulator supplies another allow the relationship to be specified > using names rather than struct regulators, in a similar manner to that > allowed for consumer supplies. This allows static configuration at compile > time, reducing the need for dynamic init code. > > Also change the references to LINE supply to be system supply since line > is sometimes used for actual supplies and therefore potentially confusing. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Applied. Thanks Liam -- Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer. http://www.slimlogic.co.uk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/