Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 03:53:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 03:53:53 -0400 Received: from pc3-camc5-0-cust13.cam.cable.ntl.com ([80.4.125.13]:32203 "EHLO fenrus.demon.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 03:53:53 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 08:50:48 +0100 Message-Id: <200204270750.g3R7om023690@fenrus.demon.nl> From: arjan@fenrus.demon.nl To: Richard Thrapp cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The tainted message In-Reply-To: <1019883102.8819.48.camel@wizard> X-Newsgroups: fenrus.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.9-31 (i586)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <1019883102.8819.48.camel@wizard> you wrote: > Secondly, loading the module doesn't actually 'taint' the kernel, but > instead it mostly invalidates your chances for support from the core > kernel maintainers. and from most if not all distros > I would like to propose that a clearer, more direct message be used. > Something like "Warning: kernel maintainers may not support your kernel > since you have loaded %s: %s%s\n" would be much more informative and > correct. how about: "Warning: loading non GPL kernel module. Your kernel will be marked 'tainted'. This means kernel maintainers cannot support your kernel." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/