Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:08:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:08:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.comcast.net ([24.153.64.2]:40102 "EHLO smtp.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:08:12 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:09:50 -0400 From: Jerry McBride Subject: Re: 2.5.10-dj1 compilation failure In-Reply-To: To: Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <20020427140950.789adbb1.mcbrides9@comcast.net> Organization: TEAM LINUX MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4claws (GTK+ 1.2.8; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-message-flag: Join the Wave and install Linux Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter wrote: > That stuff might be useful in a CVS or BK() source code archive. > What is the purpose of releasing a kernel tarball that does not compile? > Kernel tarball are there to be compiled and tried out .... > MAN! You said a mouth full. I've found syntax errors, misspellings and just plain old junk text in the make files of 2.5.10. I appreciate the efforts going into the new kernel tree. I really look forward to it becoming main stream... but MY GOD, at least I wish they would try to compile the thing BEFORE it gets posted for download! -- ************************************************************************* ***** Registered Linux User Number 185956 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux 2:04pm up 45 days, 19:20, 2 users, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/