Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:12:44 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] - Randomize node rotor used in
 cpuset_mem_spread_node()
Message-Id: <20100428161244.5d351395.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <1272495846.21962.1090.camel@calx>
References: <20100428131158.GA2648@sgi.com>
	<20100428150432.GA3137@sgi.com>
	<20100428154034.fb823484.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<1272495846.21962.1090.camel@calx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 729
Lines: 17

On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:04:06 -0500
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:

> > I suspect random32() would suffice here.  It avoids depleting the
> > entropy pool altogether.
> 
> I wouldn't worry about that. get_random_int() touches the urandom pool,
> which will always leave entropy around. Also, Ted and I decided over a
> year ago that we should drop the whole entropy accounting framework,
> which I'll get around to some rainy weekend.

hm, so why does random32() exist?  Speed?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/