Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758706Ab0D3SAR (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:00:17 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:42488 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933749Ab0D3R7O (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:59:14 -0400 X-Authenticated: #15668376 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+gcXBGTQWgPWuZi7PrpBCDUqalssApUXuJVchNbZ 2oN89lBfMGQXwz From: Peter Fritzsche To: Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] asm-generic: Don't warn that atomic_t is only 24 bit Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:53:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.32-3-amd64; KDE/4.4.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: David Howells , Jamie Lokier , Arnd Bergmann , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Heiko Carstens , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Keith M Wesolowski , Martin Schwidefsky References: <20100428162708.GB2846@Krystal> <22809.1272558128@redhat.com> <20100429211035.GA16179@Krystal> In-Reply-To: <20100429211035.GA16179@Krystal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201004301053.09003.peter.fritzsche@gmx.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.59999999999999998 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1417 Lines: 35 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com) wrote: > > Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > How about simply replacing arch/mn10300/include/asm/atomic.h by: > > > > > > arch/mn10300/include/asm/atomic.h: > > > #include > > > > > > ? > > > > > > This should have been done a while ago. They are almost the same, > > > except for added cmpxchg*_local() in the asm-generic version (which > > > would benefit to mn10300). > > > > Fine by me. > > Then I'll let Peter Fritzsche deal with that. I don't want to conflict with > his current patches. No, please go for your solution. It is the right thing to do and definitely better then my "remove some comments" patch. David Howells as MN10300 maintainer already agreed to your suggestion. So I would like to recall my patch https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/95651/ and let you submit a patch with your idea to the MN10300 maintainers which supersede my patch. The state of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/95652/ hasn't been changed and I would love to see it merged by Arnd Bergmann in the next merge window. Kind regards, Peter Fritzsche -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/